【新唐人2011年3月2日訊】中共一反常態，投票支持聯合國安理會（UN Security Council）第1970號決議——制裁利比亞卡扎菲政府。是甚麽情況讓中共改變“不干涉內政”的態度，最後投下贊成票？而，聯合國制裁的內容包括：利比亞當局涉嫌“反人類罪”，與中共鎮壓“六四”學運相同。中共將如何面對？我們來看看專家的分析。
《自由亞洲電臺》報導，2月26號，在聯合國安理會舉行的緊急會議上，當辯論制裁卡扎菲政府議案時，利比亞駐聯合國代表發言，聲淚俱下，懇求各國代表投票支持制裁，特別要求把卡扎菲政府送上國際刑事法庭。他的發言止住了中共代表所謂“不干涉內政”的論點，成為辯論的轉折。中共最後也投了贊成票。
加拿大律師大衛喬高：“最後他們（中共代表）投票支持決議，但是我肯定他們很不高興，他們當然擔心有一天同樣的事降臨到他們身上。”
卡扎菲的兩次電視講話，都以中共在1989年出動軍隊坦克鎮壓天安門民主運動為例，為自己鎮壓利比亞平民的行為作辯護。這相當於告訴世界，現在利比亞政府的所作所為，就是1989年中共的所作所為。
《北京之春》主編胡平認爲：“中共在‘是否投票支持聯合國安理會制裁利比亞’的問題上陷入極大困境，如果它不投贊成票，那等於把自己和卡扎菲捆在一起推上被告席，成爲國際社會的衆矢之的；如果投贊成票，那等於從理論上承認了1989年天安門屠殺是‘反人類罪’，應該被追究責任。”
中共官方媒體在報導第1970號決議時，只談到了3項制裁，刻意隱瞞要將利比亞當局涉嫌“反人類罪”，提交國際刑事法庭這一項。
專家認為，這除了表明中共還在欺騙中國人民，無意改惡從善外，也說明中共對“反人類罪”審判的恐懼。
大衛喬高：“當然在1989年天安門事件發生的時候沒有國際刑事法庭。但是現在有了。我和大衛-麥塔斯質疑，中共對法輪功學員所做的，是‘反人類罪’，或者稱之爲‘滅絕人類罪’，我們認爲這個案件也應該送給國際刑事法庭。”
中共從1999年7月開始，用各種滅絕人性的手段虐殺法輪功學員，已造成3000多人死亡，傷殘無數，而且罪行至今沒有停止。
大衛喬高認爲，聯合國第1970號決議具有偉大的意義，但是對其他做了同樣的事情的政府，比如中共，聯合國也應該形成類似的決議案。
大衛喬高：“因爲安理會，國際刑事法庭和任何國際組織都曾經告訴中共，他們不可以繼續殺害國民，比如法輪功學員。”
聯合國第1970號決議的制裁內容包括：對利比亞實行武器禁運、禁止卡扎菲和家人以及16名親信出國旅行、凍結相關人員的海外資產、以涉嫌“反人類罪”將利比亞當局鎮壓平民的行動，提交海牙國際刑事法庭進行處理。
新唐人記者秦越、周玉林、黎安安採訪報導。
Libya Sanctions: China Facing “Crimes against Humanity”
China voted in favor of the UN Security Council』s
measure to impose sanctions on Libya.
The Libyan regime of Muammar Gadhafi is charged
with “crimes against humanity”,
as was CCP for the “Tiananmen Massacre”.
Experts believe, the CCP is facing the same situation.
According to RFA, Libya』s UN ambassador gave
an emotional speech before the Security Council
on Feb 26, calling for sanctions on Libya,
as well as investigation of the Gadhafi regime
by the International Criminal Court.
His speech stopped China from its “noninterference”
statement. In the end, China voted in favor of sanctions.
Canadian lawyer David Kilgour: “In the end,
They voted for it.
But I am sure they weren』t happy about it.
They were, of course, worried that it might
some day be applied to them.”
Gadhafi referred to “Tiananmen Massacre” in both
of his television speeches to justify his violent
treatment of the people, suggesting that
the Libyan government』s behavior was the same as
the CCP』s in 1989.
Hu Ping, editor-in-chief of Beijing Spring believes,
the CCP was in a dilemma regarding Libyan sanctions.
Voting against it would put itself in Gadhafi』s position
as the target of international condemnation,
while voting for it means admitting that
“Tiananmen Massacre” is a “crime against humanity”.
The CCP official media only reported 3 sanction
measures on Libya, with no mention of “crimes
against humanity” or the International Criminal Court.
Experts believe it is more than an attempt to deceive
the people – it shows the CCP』s fear of a trial
against its own “crimes against humanity”.
Kilgour: “Of course they didn』t have the International
Criminal Court in 1989 when the Tiananmen Square
happened, but they do have it now.
I think David Matas and I have argued that
what』s happening to the Falun Gong community
is a “crime against humanity”, or if you want to call it
“genocide”…against the Falun Gong community
in China. We think that should be referred to
the International Criminal Court too.”
The CCP started to persecute Falun Gong in July 1999.
The cruel persecution has caused over 3000 deaths,
and such a crime has not yet stopped.
David Kilgour believes that the UN sanction on Libya
is significant, and should be applied to
other governments like the Libyan regime.
David Kilgour: “The Security Council or
the International Criminal Court, or any of these
international bodies to come in and tell them that
they cannot continue to kill, for example, Falun Gong.”
The UN Resolution imposed an arm embargo to Libya,
asset freeze on Gadhafi and his children, a travel ban
on the whole family along with 16 close associates.
It referred Libya』s crackdown of people to
the Hague International Criminal Court for
an investigation of possible crimes against humanity.
NTD reporters Qin Yue, Zhou Yulin, and Li An'an
