【禁聞】配合維穩？北大清華要學生聽話報黨

【新唐人2011年3月28日訊】中國最負盛名的兩所大學近來各出奇招，北京大學宣佈將對「思想偏激」等十類重點學生進行學業會商﹔而清華大學則舉辦講座，要學生「精忠報黨」。這引來輿論的強烈反感，認為學校的舉措是控制言論，配合政府的「維穩」工作。

據北大學生工作部網站，需要會商的「重點學生」包括學業困難、思想偏激、心理脆弱、網絡成癮等10類學生。相關院系將對這 10類學生進行排查，發現後及時上報。

其中特別引發爭議的是「思想偏激」這一類別，《北京晚報》引述北大學工部副部長查晶的解釋說，主要因為有一些學生經常誇大學校工作的一些細微漏洞，「比如動不動因為食堂飯菜漲兩毛錢就批評學校。」

查晶的這一說詞引起學生反彈，有學生在新浪微博留言，指堂堂北大居然連幾個挑剔食堂漲價的學生都不能容忍，「不如改名叫『北京黨校』吧。」

北大學生：「哪有時間理他這個事兒，覺得這些都是很無聊的事兒，反正我是這麼看的。」

除了學生的反對之外，輿論也出現批評聲浪。《西安晚報》指出，「思想」作為一種思維活動的結果，屬於理性認識的範疇，無論對與錯，本身並不會危害社會，所以並不需要外界採取會商等行為來干涉。對「思想偏激」的學生進行會商也就十分荒誕。

中國網絡專欄作家劉逸明認為，打擊「思想偏激」的學生，實際上就是在遏制學生的思想和言論自由。

北大過去以「兼容並包、思想自由」聞名，北京學者凌滄洲對《自由亞洲電臺》表示，這一措施將會侮辱北大創校宗旨。

凌滄洲：「我看裡面還有一條對甚麽獨立生活的學生，也要會商制度，我說這叫甚麼事兒呢這個思想偏激如何認定？當時陳獨秀、胡適等都是北大的，這些人當時在學校看來可能都是思想偏激的，條文的出來與大學的這個是很不相容的。北大的這種自污和自宮也是由來已久的了。」

《德國之聲》引述北大經濟學教授夏業良的話說，現時校方對學生的管控是「史上最嚴」，應該是緣於目前的中國緊張形勢。他認為，「這次會商制度中提出思想偏激是一種警示，如果學生們出現參與一些事件的苗頭，就會被當作敵人一樣來打擊。」

夏業良還說，除北大外，其他高校或研究機構也常為年輕人加強所謂的「政治思想學習」，「學工部等經常會組織學生搞活動，其實都是控制學生自由思考。特別在一些敏感日，都不希望學生走出校園。」

與北大齊名的中國最高學府清華大學，日前就以「精忠報黨」為主題，開展宣傳講座， 宣揚中共一貫的「偉光正」。

民主黨創始人之一秦永敏表示，這件事可以叫中國人更清醒地認識到，目前中共與文明世界的反差有多麼巨大。

中文筆會成員陳樹慶說，「一個國民要愛自己的國家而不是黨。而且大學生讀大學的費用，都是家長自己出或是納稅人出的，又不是你黨出的，憑甚麼要來學生『精忠報黨』呢？」

與此同時，在湖北，武漢科技大學中南分校和湖北經濟學院，都先後發出「禁遊令」，禁止學生私自組織集體外遊活動，被懷疑是防止學生參加茉莉花集會的舉措。綜合來看，北大和清華恐怕是為了中共維穩，而積極對學生搞思想工作。

湖北評論人士劉亦明批評這實在很荒唐，「高校應該是一個學習的地方，不應該成為溜鬚拍馬的場所。」

新唐人記者王子琦、吳惟、王明宇綜合報導。

“Radical Thoughts” at Universities

China's two most prestigious universities recently

have implemented their own “stability” measures.

Peking University announced that it would have

consultation with students with "radical thoughts”.

Tsinghua University organized seminars for students

to be "loyal to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP)".

These measures are repugnant to the public opinion,

which believes that the universities control speech

cooperating with the regime to “maintain stability”.

According to Peking University』s (PU) web site,

10 designated student groups will have consultation,

e.g. such with academic difficulties, radical thoughts,

psychological vulnerability, Internet addiction, etc.

Faculties will identify and designate such students.

『Radical thoughts』 is the most controversial group.

Beijing Evening News quotes Vice Minister,

Cha Jing, at PU』s CCP administrative department,

explaining that there are some students who

often exaggerate minor flaws at PU: "such criticize

the School for charging more for food”.

Cha』s words caused strong reactions from students.

Some pointed out on micro-blogs on Sina.com that

PU cannot even tolerate minor criticism: “It should

be renamed to Peking Communist Party School.”

A student said to Radio Free Asia (RFA): I don't

have time for this. I see these as very silly things.”

The public opinion also criticizes the universities.

Xi'an Evening News pointed out that

"thoughts" are a result of thinking activities.

Right or wrong, they don』t harm the society.

There is no need for the outside world to intervene.

Its absurd to have consultations for 』radical thoughts』.

Chinese Internet columnist Liu Yiming believes,

attacking students with 』radical thoughts』 is, in fact,

controlling students』 thoughts and expression.

PU was famous with its doctrine called

"inclusion and freedom of thought".

Scholar Ling Cangzhou told RFA in Beijing, that this

measure is an insult to PU』s founding purpose.

Ling: “Even students with 』independent lives』 need

consultation. What is this? What is radical opinion?』

Chen Duxiu and Hu Shi were also students at PU.

Their thoughts could be perceived as radical.

This provision is totally incompatible with PU. Such

self-castration of the university is long-standing.”

Deutsche Welle quoted Prof. Xia Yeliang from PU,

saying that the university』s current student control

is the "most serious in its history". It could be due

to the current tense situation in China. He believes,

"the radical thought consultation is a warning.

If students attempt to participate in some events,

they will be attacked by the School as enemies”.

Xia said that other universities often conduct

the so-called 』political and ideological teaching』.

The Schools』 party bureaus often organize activities

for students to prevent them from free thinking. On

sensitive days, students aren』t expected to go out.

Another prestigious Chinese university, Tsinghua,

recently used the theme "loyalty to the CCP" to

organize seminars, promoting CCP』s “grandness”.

Co-founder of China Democratic Party, Qin Yongmin

said, this could make Chinese realize more clearly

the contrast between China and the civilized world.

Chinese PEN member Chen Shuqing said:

"A national should love his country but not the party.

Parents and taxpayers pay students』 fees, not CCP.

Why should they be required to be loyal to it?”

In Hubei, Wuhan University of Technology and

Hubei School of Economics issued 』travel bans』

prohibiting students to organize private group trips.

It is suspected that this is to prevent students

from joining the Jasmine rallies.

This ideological work at PU and TU by CCP

is aimed at maintenaning the party』s stability.

Hubei-based commentator Liu Yiming called

this absurd, "Universities should be learning places,

not places for shameless flattering.”

NTD reporters Wang Ziqi ,Wu Wei and Wang Mingyu.