【新唐人2011年6月6日訊】最近，大陸多名「微博名人」相繼宣佈作為獨立參選人，參加基層人大代表選舉。而同一時間，江西撫州農民錢明奇因為上訪無門，製造了針對政府部門的連環爆炸事件。評論人士認為，當局最好是用選票來拆除炸彈。但選票這條路在中國大 陸是否可行呢？下面請看報導。
中國知名評論人李承鵬日前發表博文寫道，「有人問，為甚麼要參選人大代表。」他解答說：「其實大家都是這個國家的股東，擁有十三億分之一股權。」
在這之前，中共官方媒體《環球時報》發表社論宣稱：「獨立參選人中，最受互聯網關注的，是那些一直在學習西方反對派的人。他們在試圖把中國求同存異的包容性文化，推向對抗性文化。現有體制對這部分獨立參選人的不適應幾乎是必然的。」
對此李承鵬嘲諷說，其實沒那麼多人想對抗，人們只是為了更好的討生活，《環球時報》不要從早上起床放眼過去全是假想敵；「你基因中充滿著對抗，必須找人來砸才有活下去的勇氣、才能證明地心引力，如此你不該叫圓球時報，該叫鉛球時報。」
繼李承鵬之後，另一位同樣頗具影響力的獨立參選人「五嶽散人「」，也在個人博客中批駁《環球時報》的社論文章，他認為，這根本就是試圖從根本上斷絕任何人獨立參選的可能性。
除了官媒高調批判獨立參選人之外，上個月中旬的時候，江西新余市的劉萍、魏忠平、李思華等獨立候選人，在地方選舉期間，就曾經受到警方拘禁或監視限制，使他們參選受阻。
江西獨立參選人李思華：「我去人大諮詢選舉日的問題，那麼人大選舉委員會的工作人員就回答我：'不關你的事！不要你管！'有個人講：'他們大概只聽得懂錢明奇的聲音，聽不懂別人的聲音。'」
早些時候，江西撫州農民錢明奇因為強拆問題多年上訪無門，最終製造了多人死傷的連環爆炸案。
中國知名評論人笑蜀據此在微博上留言表示：「撫州爆炸的蘑菇雲驚醒我們，趕緊爭取屬於我們的選票。否則，聽任絕望蔓延，就會有無數個錢明奇出現。炸彈不是捂蓋子能捂掉的，只能用選票拆除炸彈。」
大陸民間選舉專家姚立法：「我們要結束、終結'槍桿子裡面出政權'這種理論，這種暴政的理論，以黑制黑、以暴制暴 這種理論，我們宣傳的是'選票箱裡出政權'。」
姚立法同時還分析了，在中國大陸，公民參選遇阻的深層原因。
姚立法：「真正按照個人的意志、按照法定的程序，行使他的選舉權和被選舉權的話，他們感到是恐懼的，他們實質是恐懼的，他們是十分害怕。而且他們心裡更明白的是：真正民主的那一天，就是他們末日的來臨。」
大陸資深媒體人章文在博文中談到，「要選票，還是炸彈？這是擺在中國人面前越來越迫切的兩個選項，100年前的清政府也曾面臨過，結果處置不當喪失政權。」
新唐人記者李靜、李謙、周天採訪報導。
Votes or Bombs?
Recently, many Chinese "micro-blog celebrities"
have announced their run in local elections,
as independent candidates. At the same time,
farmer Qian Mingqi in Fuzhou, Jiangxi Province
bombed several local government departments,
as he couldn』t petition for his forced demolition case.
Commentators believe the best way for authorities
to dismantle a bomb is through elections.
Well-known critic Li Chengpeng wrote on his blog:
"People ask me why I』m running in this election.
I respond, we are all shareholders in this country.
Each holds one of 1.3 billion shares.”
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP)』s media
Global Times editorial declared:
"Among independent candidates, netizens are most
concerned about people, who have been studying
Western oppositions. They are trying to turn
China』s inclusive culture into a confrontational one.”
Li refuted the argument. He said, not many people
want to oppose anyone. They just want a better life.
Global Times can only see imaginary enemies.
Li: "As Global Times faces much opposition,
to survive, it needs to attack people, therefore
it should change its name to 『Lead Shot Times.』”
Another equally influential independent candidate,
Wuyue Sanren, refuted the editorial in his blog.
He said it was attempting to eliminate any possibility
of independent candidates running for elections.
In mid May, in Xinyu City of Jiangxi Province,
independent candidates Liu Ping, Wei Zhongping
and Li Sihua had been detained and monitored
by police, who impeded their election.
Jiangxi independent candidate Li Sihua: “I went
to People』s Congress to ask about the election,
the staff responded: 'It is none of your business!'”
A netizen commented: “They probably understand
only Qian Mingqi』s voice, not the voice of others.
Farmer Qian Mingqi in Fuzhou, Jiangxi Province
set off bombs that caused many deaths.
Well-known commentator Xiao Shu micro-blogged,
"We are awakening by mushroom clouds.
We need to quickly win the votes that belong to us.
If the despair spreads, numerous Qians will appear.
Bombs can only be dismantled by votes.”
Expert on civil elections Yao Lifa: “We want the end
of (CCP』) theory 』power comes from military might.』
This is a theory of violence and tyranny.
We advocate 』power comes from ballot boxes.』
Yao analyzed the underlying causes
of independent candidates being impeded.
Yao: “Peoples』 independent exercising of legal rights
of participating in elections and being elected
makes the CCP fearful. The CCP truly understands
that when China becomes a democracy, it will die.”
Chinese veteran media professional, Zhang Wen,
wrote on his blog, “Votes or bombs?
These are the two options before the Chinese.
100 years ago, the Qing government
faced the same crisis. Their improper
handling of the issue cost them the power."
NTD reporters Li Jing, Li Qian and Zhou Tian
