【禁聞】「博愛一日捐」 紅十字會曝「強捐」門

【新唐人2011年8月13日訊】「郭美美事件」所引發的風波還未平息，「中國紅十字會」近日再次遭遇信任危機。媒體曝光：在天津市紅十字會推行的「博愛一日捐」活動中，存在「強捐」現象。大陸法律專家認為，這種「強捐」沒有法律依據，涉嫌違法。分析人士指出，「中國紅十字會」是在褻瀆國際「紅十字會」的宗旨，實際應該稱為「中共紅十字會」。

台灣《中時電子報》報導，天津市紅十字會在推出的「博愛一日捐」活動中，強制要求市內各級機關工作人員捐出部分工資，雖然號稱自願捐款，但有企業員工抱怨自己被「強捐」了，就是說，捐款直接從工資中被扣除。也有網友反映，連看門的人員都被要求捐了30元。

天津市北辰區紅十字會發佈一份文件，要求這項活動在7月31號前展開，對像是北辰區各級機關、團體、企事業單位內，有工資收入的在職人員和有效益的企業。文件要求企業捐出1天的收益，各級黨政機關、事業單位工作人員捐出1天的工資。

北辰區紅十字會還對具體的捐款金額提出了要求，在「捐款數額參考標準」中規定：局級捐400元，處級捐300元、科級捐230元，甚至對高級工、初級工的捐款金額也規定得一清二楚。

天津某單位職工在「博愛一日捐」活動中，被單位扣了工資。他對《南方都市報》抱怨說：「我被強捐了，這郭美美事件還沒過，紅十字會就扣工資當捐款啊？」

陝西律師張鑑康：「紅十字會就是一個慈善組織吧，款項應該是來自於公民和企業的認捐，你強制的話，是沒有法律依據的。」

事實上，除天津市外，山西、河北等地，每年也都搞「博愛一日捐」，山東則是「慈心一日捐」。大陸各地紅十字會推出的各種募捐活動名目繁多，數不勝數。

就在6、7月份，安徽省亳（音: Bó）州市居然推出了所謂「福彩一日捐」——「動員職工捐出一天的工資購買福利彩票」，這項募捐活動也因為涉及勸捐、強捐，而飽受民眾和媒體的批評。

大陸作家陳永苗在接受《新唐人》採訪時表示，按照國際紅十字會的宗旨，紅十字會應該起到護士的作用，而不是像「中國紅十字會」這樣來參與商業壟斷的運作。

陳永苗：「像報紙，現在《人民日報》的攤派一樣，是強行攤派，強行捐助，強制性的。這已經嚴重偏離了國際紅十字會的宗旨，建議國際紅十字會，應該把中國紅十字會開除掉，否則這不是對他們宗旨的極大的污衊嗎？」

內蒙古五原縣紅十字會在今年（2011年）的募捐活動中，除了定下捐款標準外，更是直接規定：「捐款人數不得少於總人數的98%」。

海外民運人士、中國民主黨福建委員會主席王傳忠，他通過親身經歷指出，在美國根本沒有可能發生這種事情，在中國，紅十字會是中共控制的一個組織，而所有的企事業單位、團體都必須服從中共的統治才能生存，所以，才會有「強捐」存在。

王傳忠：「中國紅十字會，這個紅十字會呢，前面是中國兩個字，其實質就是中共的紅十字會，而不是屬於國際上那種紅十字會的性質。」

在此之前，沸沸揚揚的「郭美美事件」讓中國紅十字會成為各界輿論的焦點，並一度陷入信任危機。迫於公眾要求帳目公開的壓力，7月31號，中國紅十字總會發佈捐贈信息查詢平臺，但平臺查詢到的「青海玉樹地震」捐贈數據卻被嚴重縮水。比如，查詢到的李連杰「壹基金」對玉樹地震的捐款只有25430元，而實際捐款金額多達263萬元。

新唐人記者常春、李謙、孫寧採訪報導。

Red Cross: Forced Donations In Tianjin

The 『Guo Meimei incident』 storm is not over

and the Chinese Red Cross has once again suffered a blow to its credibility.

The Red Cross in Tianjin initiated the 『Fraternity Donation Day,』

forcing people to make donations.

Mainland legal experts believe the forced donations

have no legal basis and are most probably illegal.

Analysts point out that the Chinese Red Cross is desecrating

the International Red Cross』 mission, and should be called the “CCP (Chinese Communist Party) Red Cross.”

The online version of Taiwan』s China Times reported that

the Tianjin Red Cross Fraternity Donation Day event,

forced workers at all levels of the municipal government

to donate a portion of their wages.

Although the contributions were referred to as “voluntary,”

the employees complained that they were forced to donate,

that is, contributions were deducted directly from their wages.

A netizen said, “Even the janitor was asked to donate!”

The Tianjin Beichen District Red Cross issued a document,

requiring that its donation event start before the end of July,

so as to include employees in all levels of government agencies,

groups, enterprises, and institutions that are making profits.

The document required that these enterprises donate

one day』s worth of income, and employees in public and

government organizations would need to donate

one day』s worth of wages.

The Beichen Red Cross also set specific requirements on the

amount of donations that one had to make.

According to the 『standard level of contributions,』 rule

bureau-level workers have to donate RMB 400 (US$62.59),

while division-level workers have to donate RMB 300 (US$47.00),

and section-level have to donate RMB 230 (US$36.00).

There』s also set requirements for senior and primary workers.

A worker in Tianjin had his wages deducted at the Fraternity

Donation Day event.

He complained to the Southern City Newspaper, saying, "I was forced to donate! Guo Meimei』s case is not over.

The Red Cross dares to collect donations from my wages!”

Shaanxi lawyer, Stephen Kang:

"The Red Cross is a charitable organization; money should come from citizens and businesses

according to their will.

Forcing people to do otherwise is illegal.”

In addition to Tianjin, places in Shanxi and Hebei Province

all hold a Love Donation Day event every year.

Shandong Province holds a Compassion Donation Day event.

The mainland Red Cross holds a slew of fundraising campaigns.

In June and July, Bozhou City in Anhui Province even launched

the so-called Lottery Donation Day event, asking workers to donate one day's worth of wages to buy welfare lottery.

This forced donations, fund-raising activity was also criticized.

ChenYongmiao, a mainland writer, told New Tang Dynasty TV

that according to the International Red Cross』 mission,

its mission is to serve as nurses and doctors for the needy,

rather than operate commercial-run monopolies, like the Chinese Red Cross.

Chen Yongmiao: "Like a newspaper, such as the People's Daily,

there is forced distribution and forced contributions.

Thus, the Chinese Red Cross has severely deviated

from the International Red Cross』 original mission.

I suggest that the International Red Cross abolish the

Chinese Red Cross, otherwise it』ll tarnish the Red Cross』 name.”

In Wuyuan County in Inner Mongolia,

the Red Cross set up requirements for fund-raising activities in 2011,

and even states

"The number of people who donate should be no less than 98%."

Chairman, Wang Chuanzhong, of Democratic Party in Fujian,

points out from his personal experience, that such things would never occur in the US.

In China, the Red Cross is under the control of the CCP,

and all enterprises, institutions, and groups must obey every CCP rule to survive.

Thus, forced donations are rampant.

Wang Chuanzhong: "The Chinese Red Cross, has the word

『Chinese』 in front of the words 『Red Cross,』 however,

its nature is actually the CCP Red Cross, not

the International Red Cross."

The Guo Meimei case had made the Chinese Red Cross the center of attention in the public』s eye, thus,

people no longer trust it as they have lost all confidence in it.

Forced by public opinion on July 31, the Chinese Red Cross

set up a donation information search platform in which donation

amounts were open to the public in Yushu City,

in Qinghai Province, but officials underreported the figures.

For example, a query into Jet Li's One Foundation contributions

to Yushu Province are listed as only RMB 25,430 (US$4,000), but the actual amount was RMB 2.63 million (US$408,000).

NTD reporters Chang Chun, Li Qian and Sun Ning