【禁聞】藥家鑫處死 民意還是陰謀？

【新唐人2011年6月9日訊】在中國引發極大民憤的殺人犯藥家鑫最近被處死。這個本來並不複雜的案件，牽動了整個網絡、媒體與社會，為藥家鑫開脫罪責的聲音更是不斷出現，讓民間不時擔憂：法律再次被踐踏。而這次順應民意處決藥家鑫，再一次引來各方輿論對這個案件的探討，其中也不乏「陰謀論」之說。 我們下面來看看報導。

藥家鑫是西安音樂學院鋼琴系的學生，去年（2010年）10月份，他開著私家車撞傷26歲的女工張妙。藥家鑫不但不送張妙到醫院治療，反而對張妙連刺八刀致死，逃逸過程中又撞傷兩人。

今年4月20號，西安中級法院作出一審判決，以故意殺人罪判處藥家鑫死刑；陝西省高院5月20號駁回藥家鑫上訴，維持原判，並報請最高法院核准。最高法院覆核後，6月7號藥家鑫在西安被執行死刑。

藥家鑫殺人案發生後，因為他的犯罪動機極其卑劣、手段特別殘忍，而引發民眾和社會輿論的極大關注。但在群情激憤的聲討中，官方電視臺央視和其他一些媒體，卻對藥家鑫進行了一系列偏袒報導，中國人民公安大學犯罪心理學教授李玫瑾更是在電視上語出驚人，指藥家鑫連殺八刀是他彈琴養成的「強迫性動作」。

官方極力為藥家鑫開脫，使「藥家鑫該不該被判死刑」的問題，一度成為疑問。

如今伴隨著藥家鑫的被處決，各界有多方的猜測、探討與反思。

昝愛宗（前國家海洋報記者）：「這樣的事件發生太不幸了， 人要能通過這樣的事情能反思一下，能給活著的人一種啟示，要珍惜生命、尊重每一個生命。」

《美國之音》報導則認為，在網絡等媒體的監督之下，中共當局再也無法坐視網民的力量，藥家鑫案件體現平民獲得了勝利。

另有輿論認為，藥家鑫的死，其實是一場官方佈下的「陰謀」。網絡上有一篇名為《藥家鑫案最後的勝利者出人意料》的文章，作者認為，藥家鑫案如此火熱的原因是：藥家鑫的背後有一個實力強大的「公關團隊」，而這個「公關團隊」的目地，卻不是像表面所表現的—— 為藥家鑫免死，而是要在掀起一輪輪高潮、吊足民眾的胃口之後，再讓藥家鑫「順應民意」曲折而艱難的死去。從而讓老百姓天真的以為中國的法律真的是不畏強權的，是公正的，進而烘託出中共的「偉光正」。文章還說，這是中共一貫以來的常用手法。

回顧藥家鑫案件死刑核准的過程中，官方《國際在線》發表評論說，「民意不能成為判處藥家鑫死刑的依據。」

不僅僅是官方媒體為藥家鑫說話，西安也有五位教授聯名發表一封公開信，呼籲法院「刀下留人」。

這一系列為藥家鑫免判死刑而進行的大力造勢，再加上6月7號央視非常即時的評論:「藥家鑫案審判彰顯司法公正」，不免讓人相信，藥家鑫背後強大的「公關團隊」的存在。

新唐人記者黃麗達、李謙、朱娣綜合報導。

Public Will Or PR Conspiracy?

Yao Jiaxin, a murderer who infuriated the public,

was sentenced to death and said to be executed.

His case has involved both the media and society.

Some defend him, while others worry

about laws being disregarded. As Yao』s sentence

seems to follow the will of the public,

some see this process as more of a “conspiracy.”

Yao Jiaxin, student at Xi』an Music Conservatory,

hit a woman with his car last October and

instead of calling an ambulance,

Yao stabbed the woman 8 times, killing her.

Escaping the scene, Yao injured two more people.

This April, Xi』an municipal court sentenced

Yao Jiaxin to death for intentional homicide.

Yao』s appeal was overturned by the Shaanxi

Supreme Court, and the Chinese Supreme Court

approved the death sentence.

Yao』s execution was announced on June 7.

Yao Jiaxin』s cruelty has drawn wide attention.

Amidst public anger however, official media

put out a series of reports defending Yao.

Li Meijin, a criminal psychologist

from Xi』an Public Security University,

said Yao』s knife attack on the hit victim

was an “involuntary reaction.”.

Official media tried to instill doubts in the public

whether Yao should receive the death penalty.

Now when Yao』s death sentence is executed,

many ponder about this incident.

Zai Aimin (former reporter): “This case is so sad

and people should reflect on its meaning;

we must treasure and respect each and every life.”

Radio Voice of America said that with media

and the Internet, the Chinese Communist Party

(CCP) cannot neglect the power of netizens;

and Yao』s sentence is victory of the people.

Others see Yao』s case as a regime』s “conspiracy.”

A blog article on Yao』s “surprise sentencing” said

that a professional PR team is behind Yao』s case.

The PR goal was hidden. It defended Yao,

so people』s interest in the case would rise,

and this would highlight Yao』s final sentence

as a hard process of “following public opinion.”

People would see that the law is fair

and the CCP is great and right.

During Yao』s case, the official CRI Online wrote:

“public opinion can』t be base of Yao』s sentencing.”

Not only did official media defend Yao,

five Xi』an professors also asked for leniency.

After the media campaign in Yao』s defense,

Central Chinese TV commented,

“Yao』s case reflects the just legal procedures.”

For some, the motive of the official PR is clear.

NTD reporters Huang Lida , Li Qian and Zhu Di