【禁聞】司馬南遭尖銳提問 呵斥學生閉嘴

【新唐人2011年11月22日訊】大陸左派人士司馬南，剛剛因為污衊藝術家艾未未與盲人維權律師陳光誠，被深圳一名女子千里進京“砸場”。 19號，在「中國青年政治學院」再遭大學生們尖銳提問，司馬南大動肝火，厲聲要學生“閉嘴”。事後，民眾為這些學生叫好，認為：從這些學生身上，看到了中國的希望。

11月19號晚間，大陸左派人士司馬南在「中國青年政治學院」進行了一場演講。學生們在現場交流互動時，提出了幾個很犀利的問題。第二天，大陸網站上出現了這段名為“司馬南演講現場遭遇大學生尖銳提問”的現場視頻集錦。

穿黑色夾克衫的男生：“毛澤東思想在建國前30年的實踐之中，1958年反右擴大98%，1959年至1961年3000萬人的白骨，1966年至1976年文革稀裡糊塗。包括毛澤東思想的外輸，在柬埔寨建立的波爾布特紅色高棉政權，導致柬埔寨700萬人口之中，死亡超過200萬。通過這一系列的，包括在打天下、治天下的過程之中，毛澤東思想所產生的一些問題，還包括學術上、邏輯論述上的一些困難，你如何還能在今天來提升毛澤東思想？”

另一位穿羽絨服的男生質問司馬南，山東盲人維權人士陳光誠，為何被嚴密監禁，網友去看他卻被毆打，為甚麼這些打人的人可以不遵守憲法?

一位身穿紅色外套的男生則聯繫台灣的憲政，向司馬南提問：在大陸，連人大代表候選人是怎麼產生的都不知道，獨立參選人被當局打壓，公民沒有選舉權的政治制度難道是合理的嗎?

還有一位男生質疑司馬南，你號稱“中共代表人民的利益”。但為甚麼，作為人民的一員，我們要被當局強制灌輸某一種特定的意識形態呢？

男生：“我們從小就在政治課上，接受馬克思主義的洗腦，但是我們認為，我們每個人都是不同的個體，理應有權利接受不同的理念，並從中選擇自己的政治理念。我們要自己選擇某種政治理念，作為在這個世界對政治的看法。你是否認為，執政當局安排的政治洗腦課，是對我們個人政治認識的侵犯？”

每一位學生發言過後，現場都爆發出熱烈的掌聲。但學生們的踴躍提問，卻經常遭到司馬南的呵斥與威脅。

學生：“這個問題就反映出，你沒有用學術的態度來研究這些問題。”

司馬南：“不要這樣子說話，你要是再說...”

學生：“我第一次面對'國際五毛'，我有點激動，真的。”

司馬南更是在窘迫之下，失態的不斷訓斥一位想要發言的男生“閉嘴！”

這段視頻曝光後，立即走紅網絡，引發很多網民的共鳴。網友感嘆：誰說，中國的春天永遠不會到來？希望就在當下，就在民眾的心中。

美國紐約城市大學政治學教授夏明表示，在當局高壓封鎖之下，這些年輕人能夠有這麼清晰的認識，說明中共面臨越來越大的挑戰。

夏明教授：“現在我們看到的是90後這一代了，儘管他們沒有參與89（64學生運動），但是他們已經接上來了，所以這一點，讓我覺得：中國目前發生大變化，這種基礎逐漸在出現。”

夏明教授指出，司馬南依附當權者，用政權撐腰，進行炒作、獲取名利。司馬南居高臨下的教訓學生說明，他的演講是在灌輸，而不是正常的雙向互動與交流。

夏明教授：“演講本身如果沒有聽眾的話，你就沒有演講。而如果聽眾沒辦法參與到整個演講過程的話，這個演講就不是一個對話，而是一種灌輸和說教了。顯然，司馬南想要維護的是一種說教的格局和說教的模式。”

前些年，司馬南曾經配合當局，竭力反對當局認定的所謂“偽科學”，也因此和何祚庥、方舟子一起，被網民譏諷為：不懂科學，卻自命“反偽鬥士”。近來，他活躍在左派網站上，頻頻挑戰公眾言論，被網民稱為“五毛黨”黨魁。

新唐人記者常春、李謙 、孫寧採訪報導。

Embarrassed Sima Nan Shouts “Shut Up” at Students

Recently, a young girl from Shenzhen l travelled to

Beijing to denounce Sima Nan during his lecture,

because Sima had slandered artist Ai Weiwei and

blind activist lawyer Chen Guangcheng.

On Nov. 19, students again waged sharp questions to

him at China Youth University for Political Sciences.

Enraged, Sima Nan urged students to "shut up."

Later, people applauded these students,

saying that they saw China』s future through these students.

The evening of Nov. 19, Mainland leftist Sima Nan delivered

a speech at China Youth University for Political Sciences.

Students waged a number of very sensitive questions.

The next day, a video appeared on Mainland internet named

“Sima Nan again Encounters Embarrassing Questions at Speech.”

One male student was quoted saying:

Maoism incurred a series of problems.

During the years of 1959-1961 it caused 30

million unnatural deaths, followed by the Cultural Revolution.

Outside China, Maoism gave rise to the Khmer Rouge regime

in Cambodia, which killed over 2 million of 7 million people.

Given all these historical problems, together with academic

and logical problems within Maoism, how can you inherit it today?

Another student asked Sima, why Shandong blind activist

Chen Guangcheng was detained, and his visitors beaten.

Why can those that beat people not abide by

the Constitution?

One of the boys in the audience mentioned

Taiwan's constitutional politics.

He questioned Mainland』s election system where people

do not know how candidates are produced and independent candidates are suppressed by the authorities.

Another student said, CCP claims to represent people's

interests, but why, as part of the people, are students forced to accept a particular kind of ideology?

We grew up with ideological indoctrination and Marxist

brainwashing,

but we believe that each of us is an independent

individual, with the right to choose political philosophy.

Do you think the authority』s political brainwashing

is a violation of our own personal political choice?

Each question was followed by an eruption of applause,

but Sima Nan denounced and threatened the students for the questions.

One student exclaimed: Thus it proves that you are not taking

an academic attitude towards this issue.

Sima: Do not talk like this. If you say it again, ...

Student again replied: It is the first time that I face an “international fifty-cents.

I am a little excited, really."

Embarrassed, Sima Nan constantly rebuked

the student to "shut up!"

This video immediately became popular after its release.

Netizens said, who says China』s spring will never come?

Hope is in the moment, in the hearts of the people!

Xia Ming, professor of political science at City University

of NY, said that these young people demonstrated such consciousness under CCP』s high pressure,

indicating increasing challenges to CCP.

Professor Xia Ming said,

“Now we see this post-90s generation growing up.

Although they did not participate in “Tian'anmen Massacre,”

they did however inherit its spirit.

This makes me feel that China is undergoing a major change

that is now taking shape”.

Professor Xia Ming pointed out Sima Nan collaborated with

CCP for fame and fortune.

His condescending scolding to the students shows that

he indoctrinates instead of communicates.

Professor Xia Ming says, without an audience,

a speech does not count as speech.

Without an audiences participation,

a speech is not communication but indoctrination.

It is clear that Sima Nan tries to maintain a pattern of

preaching and indoctrinating.

Some years ago, Sima collaborated with CCP to denounce

the so-called "pseudo-sciences."

Together with He Zuoxiu and Fang Zhouzi,

Sima received netizens』 criticism as an unscientific fighter against pseudo-sciences.

Recently, he was active in left-wing websites

to frequently challenge public opinions.

He thus received the title Chairman of Fifty-Cent Party.

NTD Reporters Chang Chun, Li Qian and Sun Ning